Community College 7
Item set
Title
Community College 7
Description
The history of the City University of New York (CUNY) has been fundamentally shaped and reshaped, in large part, by decisions of city and state officials, especially about where to site new colleges in the expanding municipal college system. One such controversy erupted in the early 1960s when CUNY officials and city politicians chose in 1963 to site a new community college (Kingsborough Community College) for Brooklyn in the largely white neighborhood of Sheepshead Bay, rather than in the largely Black and Puerto Rican neighborhoods of central Brooklyn. Five years later, in February 1968, when CUNY announced plans to establish a new “Community College 7 in or near Bedford-Stuyvesant… oriented to the Bedford-Stuyvesant Community and operated in consultation with the community,” the leaders of an extensive network of education advocacy groups and civil society organizations from that very community responded immediately and forcefully, with the memory of the struggle over Kingsborough Community College very much fresh in their minds. “Responsible Community Leaders,” wrote Ulysses Jordan, Chair of the Education Committee of the Bedford Stuyvesant Youth in Action Network “… were not consulted by the Educational Structure on both the state and local levels, in respect to programming and the planning stages for the development of this college," as this document in the Community College 7 collection indicates.
In the months that followed, appointed representatives of the Bedford-Stuyvesant network of advocacy groups met with CUNY officials to argue for and collaborate in planning a college that they hoped would fulfill their community’s shared vision of an institution addressed to the priorities and potential of the community’s Black and Puerto Rican cjtizens. For a few key activists and leaders, many of whom were simultaneously involved in the Community Control movement for racial justice in New York City’s K-12 schools, that vision was of a college planned and governed by Central Brooklyn community leaders and organizations. As their negotiations with CUNY officials continued throughout 1968, the group’s leaders also convened and facilitated large public meetings to engage local leaders, educators, and youth expressing and framing demands for the college, and to create a system and structure for active community engagement with and control over the new college.
Among the Bedford Stuyvesant’s community organizations’ collaborators was Donald Watkins, a white professor, dean, and Vice President at CUNY’s Brooklyn College. This collection, curated from Watkins’s papers (and generously made available to CDHA by Michael Woodsworth) details records of the meeting minutes, announcements, planning documents and correspondence of the educational coalitions and committees that convened to represent Central Brooklyn in the negotiations with CUNY over Community College 7. This collection complements the The Founding of Medgar Evers College collection on this site, curated by Florence Tager, which is drawn largely from CUNY officials’ documents, meeting minutes, and telegrams, memos, handwritten notes from those events. It was curated by Juliet Young, a doctoral student in the Graduate Center’s Urban Education PhD program.
In the months that followed, appointed representatives of the Bedford-Stuyvesant network of advocacy groups met with CUNY officials to argue for and collaborate in planning a college that they hoped would fulfill their community’s shared vision of an institution addressed to the priorities and potential of the community’s Black and Puerto Rican cjtizens. For a few key activists and leaders, many of whom were simultaneously involved in the Community Control movement for racial justice in New York City’s K-12 schools, that vision was of a college planned and governed by Central Brooklyn community leaders and organizations. As their negotiations with CUNY officials continued throughout 1968, the group’s leaders also convened and facilitated large public meetings to engage local leaders, educators, and youth expressing and framing demands for the college, and to create a system and structure for active community engagement with and control over the new college.
Among the Bedford Stuyvesant’s community organizations’ collaborators was Donald Watkins, a white professor, dean, and Vice President at CUNY’s Brooklyn College. This collection, curated from Watkins’s papers (and generously made available to CDHA by Michael Woodsworth) details records of the meeting minutes, announcements, planning documents and correspondence of the educational coalitions and committees that convened to represent Central Brooklyn in the negotiations with CUNY over Community College 7. This collection complements the The Founding of Medgar Evers College collection on this site, curated by Florence Tager, which is drawn largely from CUNY officials’ documents, meeting minutes, and telegrams, memos, handwritten notes from those events. It was curated by Juliet Young, a doctoral student in the Graduate Center’s Urban Education PhD program.
Date
1967 - 1970
Language
English

Collection
Community College 7
Subjects
Time Periods
1961-1969 The Creation of CUNY - Open Admissions Struggle
Items
-
Committee to Clarify Policy memo, June 13, 1968 B-SCENS Committee to Clarify Policy, in a June 13, 1968, memorandum, reported on approved changes to the Coalition's policy on removal of the chair and members of the Steering Committee. -
Chancellor Albert Bowker to Al Vann: Letter - May 22, 1969 On May 22, 1969, Albert Bowker, Chancellor of the City University of New York wrote a letter to Al Vann, Chairman of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS), conveying his wish to overcome a “deadlock” over the choice of president for Community College 7. In the letter, Bowker clarifies his reasons for not supporting Rhody McCoy for the presidency, and his position on the power of the representative delegation of Bedford-Stuyvesant community organizations, led by Vann, to select a president for the new CUNY college. Bowker concluded by expressing concerns that Community College 7 may not be established if Vann and his contingent are unwilling to compromise. -
Committee to Seek Presidents for Community Colleges 7 and 8: Minutes - February 15, 1968, On February 15, 1968, seven City University of New York (CUNY) officials met to discuss their role and responsibilities as the Committee to Seek Presidents for Community Colleges Seven and Eight. The Committee agreed that their “primary focus… was to seek presidents” for the two new colleges, and that they would also consult with community organizations in Bedford-Stuyvesant, the announced location for Community College 7 and that two or three community delegates might “sit with the committee. . .with the same privileges afforded to faculty members who have been invited to participate by other Board [of Higher Education] presidential search committees.” In the coming weeks, Bedford-Stuyvesant community leaders successfully advocated for the committee's expansion to include five community representatives, balanced by an equal number of five CUNY officials. -
December 2, 1970 CUNY Press Release Announcing Medgar Evers: New College in Central Brooklyn On December 2, 1970, the City University of New York issued a press release announcing that a new college planned in and for Central Brooklyn, referred to in previous plans and documents as “Community College 7,” would be named for Civil Rights leader Medgar Evers, who had been assassinated in Mississippi in 1963. -
Brooklyn Branch Education Committee of the NAACP Press Release, March 16, 1970: The Appointment of Richard Trent as President of Medgar Evers College, CUNY On March 16, 1970 the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) issued a press release announcing their approval of the appointment of Richard Trent as the president of the newly established Medgar Evers College, CUNY in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. In the press release, the authors criticized the stances and tactics taken by the Bedford-Stuyvesant community leaders originally delegated two years earlier to engage in negotiations with City University of New York (CUNY) officials, holding the community leaders responsible for delaying and jeopardizing the establishment of the new college in and for Central Brooklyn. The press release concluded with the NAACP’s call to the Bedford-Stuyvesant community’s “silent majority” to support the new college in the face of continued controversy over its founding and leadership that they anticipated. -
Draft Letter from Al Vann to the Editor of the Amsterdam News On February 14, 1970, Al Vann, Chairman of the then-disbanded Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services, wrote a letter to the editor of the Amsterdam News, offering his account of the negotiations that had taken place over the past two years between Bedford-Stuyvesant community leaders and City University of New York (CUNY) officials in planning Medgar Evers College, originally referred to as “Community College 7.” In his letter, Vann responded to public criticism, defending the firm stance he and the Coalition had taken in advocating for a college controlled by the community, and willing to “do what is necessary to protect [Black youth], and to build a firm foundation – necessary for the rebirth of the dignity and strength of the Black man.” -
January 31, 1969 Draft Letter to the Editor of the New York Times from Al Vann On January 31, 1969, Al Vann, circulated to his fellow Steering Committee Members of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS) a draft letter to the Editor of the New York Times, responding to an article published the day before. In the article, the Times had reported that the Ford Foundation, as a condition for disbursement of a $442,000 grant for the establishment of Community College 7, had asked the City University of New York (CUNY) to review its relationship with Vann, in response to concerns voiced by some faculty members’ over allegedly anti-Semitic statements he had made. In his draft letter, Vann decried his accusers’ choice to attack a community “determined to work through the democratic process to eradicate the educational ills” of their youth, and called broadly for an end “to attempts to carry us away from our focus” in the community's efforts to establish the new college. -
January 27, 1969 Resolution of the Board of Higher Education approving the establishment of a four-year experimental college in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn On January 27, 1969, the Board of Higher Education of New York City resolved to establish an “experimental four-year college of professional studies located in or near Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn,” effectively supplanting plans announced a year earlier to establish Community College 7 as a two-year institution. The resolution marked a victory for Bedford-Stuyvesant’s educators and community leaders who had vigorously advocated and negotiated for the new college to be a senior, four-year degree granting institution with relevant professional pathways for the community’s youth. -
September 24, 1969 Letter from Al Vann to Porter Chandler On September 24, 1969, Al Vann, Chairman of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS) wrote a letter to Porter Chandler, Chairman of the Board of Higher Education, responding to a recent Resolution of the Executive Committee of the Board of Higher Education to disband the Presidential Search and Planning Committee for Community College 7, of which Vann had been a community-appointed member. In his letter, Vann denies the authority of the Board of Higher Education and its Executive Committee to disband the committee and, as they had also announced, to proceed in planning a college in and for Bedford-Stuyvesant without the “involvement, support and endorsement” of the B-SCENS and its members. -
September 24, 1969 Letter from Chancellor Albert Bowker to Al Vann On September 24, 1969, Albert Bowker, Chancellor of the City University of New York (CUNY) wrote to Al Vann, a community leader of Bedford-Stuyvesant, formally informing him of the Board of Higher Education’s Resolution eight days before to dissolve the Presidential Search and Planning Committee for Community College 7, of which Vann had been a member. In his letter, Bowker reiterated words of thanks included in the resolution for the “energy and efforts” of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS) and its delegated Negotiation Team in negotiations and plans for Community College 7, and shared his personal appreciation with Vann for the “good fellowship and stimulating give-and-take” in their collaboration. -
September 17, 1969 Letter from CUNY Vice Chancellor Julius C. C. Edelstein to Assemblyman Samuel Wright On September 17, 1969, Julius Edelstein, Vice Chancellor of the City University of New York (CUNY), wrote to Assemblyman Samuel Wright, who represented Central Brooklyn, to inform him of the Executive Committee of the Board of Higher Education (BHE)’s resolution the day before in relation to Community College 7. In that resolution, the Executive Committee had formally dissolved the Presidential Search and Planning Committee for Community College 7, composed of five CUNY officials and five representatives of Bedford-Stuyvesant’s education and community organizations. The BHE Executive Committee had further resolved to expedite plans for the new college for Central Brooklyn under the leadership of officials CUNY leaders would appoint. -
September 16, 1969 Resolution of the Board of Higher Education to Disband the Presidential Search and Planning Committee for Community College 7 On September 16, 1969 the Executive Committee of the Board of Higher Education (BHE( issued a formal resolution to dissolve the “Presidential Search and Planning Committee for Community College 7” due to the insistence of the Bedford-Stuyvesant community delegation to the committee that Rhody McCoy be appointed president of the new college. The BHE Executive Committee deemed McCoy “entirely unacceptable” for the job. The Executive Committee further resolved that Chancellor Albert Bowker should “proceed expeditiously to accelerate action on the projected college,” working with a new committee appointed entirely by the BHE. -
Unsigned July 27, 1969 Letter from "Concerned Members of the Negotiation Team" to Al Vann On July 27, 1969, “Concerned members of the Negotiation Team” of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS) drafted a letter to Al Vann, Chairman of the B-SCENS and the Negotiation Team, asking that he postpone an upcoming coalition meeting, instead meeting with the “fourteen members.” Those “fourteen” were likely a group of B=SCENS members who had written directly to City University of New York (CUNY) Chancellor Albert Bowker a month earlier, formally dissenting from the stance Vann had taken in deliberations over the selection of president for CUNY's proposed Community College 7. -
July 1969 Progress Summary to the Community from Al Vann In July 1969 Al Vann, Chairman of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS), wrote a “Progress Summary to the Community,” detailing the activities and positions of the Negotiation Team, delegated by the coalition to meet with City University of New York (CUNY) officials planning Community College 7. Approximately one month before, a splinter group of B-SCENS members had written directly to CUNY officials expressing their dissent from the Negotiation Team’s insistence that Rhody McCoy should be named the new college’s president. In his report, Vann detailed the Negotiation Team’s process and rationale for selecting McCoy as their preferred candidate, and called for the community’s support for the Negotiation Team’s authority to make decisions for a college planned by, in, and for the people of Bedford-Stuyvesant. -
May 26, 1969 Letter from Thomas Jones to Franklin Thomas On May 26, 1969, New York State Justice Thomas Jones wrote to Franklin Thomas, president of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation, forwarding a copy of a letter sent four days earlier from Albert Bowker to Al Vann, Chair of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services. In that letter, which Jones attached, Bowker had expressed a wish to overcome an “impasse” between City University of New York (CUNY) officials and an appointed planning delegation from the Bedford-Stuyvesant community, led by Vann, over preferred candidates for the presidency of the new Community College 7. In his brief cover letter, Jones expressed his alarm over “the danger that we may not get Community College 7 soon, for reasons known to many of us.” In the coming weeks, Jones, with a contingent of other community members, would publicly split from Vann and his allies in a schism that in the end determined the fate of the new college. -
April 7, 1969, letter from Hugh Smythe to Albert Bowker declining the offer of the presidency of Community College 7 On April 7, 1969, Hugh Smythe, United States Ambassador to Malta, wrote to Dr. Albert Bowker, Chancellor of the City University of New York (CUNY) declining his offer of the position of president of Community College 7. Smythe specifically recommended that the Presidential Search Committee consider Rhody McCoy, then Unit Administrator of the experimental Ocean-Hill Brownsville School district, whose role in that struggle would soon become the flashpoint for a controversy that shaped the fate of the new college. -
March 13, 1969 Minutes of the Steering Committee of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services: On March 13, 1969, the Steering Committee of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Service met to discuss progress in the planning for Community College 7. At the meeting, the Committee formulated and agreed on three “definitive items” that their five member Negotiation Team would present to City University of New York (CUNY) officials at an upcoming high-level planning meeting about Community College 7, one of which was that the college be named for the late Martin Luther King, Jr. The Steering Committee also agreed they would present CUNY officials with a unanimous recommendation for a candidate for president of the new college, but deferred their deliberations over that decision to a later meeting. -
Minutes of the February 17, 1969 Meeting of the Presidential Search Committee for Community College 7 On February 17, 1969 the Presidential Search Committee for Community College 7, composed of five City University of New York (CUNY) officials and five appointed representatives of Bedfrord-Stuyvesant community organizations, met to continue their discussions of four candidates under consideration for the presidency of the new college. The meeting was marked by open disagreement between the two contingents over one candidate, Rhody McCoy. McCoy was advanced as a candidate for the presidency by the Bedford-Stuyvesant delegation, but CUNY officials deemed him inappropriate because of his lack of academic credentials and college-level experience as well as being “the subject of great controversy” for his leadership of the school community control “experiment” underway in Ocean-Hill Brownsville. In the coming weeks, McCoy’s candidacy would become a flashpoint for escalating tensions over the Bedford-Stuyvesant community’s role in leading and planning the new college. -
February 6, 1969 Minutes of Presidential Search Committee for Community College 7 On February 6, 1969, the Presidential Search Committee for Community College 7, composed of five City University of New York (CUNY) officials and five appointed representatives of Bedford-Stuyvesant community organizations, met to discuss criteria for selection of a president for the new college and four possible candidates for the position. Among the issues discussed at the meeting was whether “possession of a Ph.D. and experience in higher education” should be a required qualification, a questions that was not resolved at this meeting. In this meeting, the Committee agreed to contact and interview a fifth prospective candidate, Hugh Smythe, United States Ambassador to Malta, to whom they would eventually offer the position. -
February 6, 1969 Minutes of the Negotiation Team of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services in preparation for the Presidential Search Committee meeting for Community College 7 The five-member Negotiation Team delegated by the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS) met on February 6, 1969, to prepare for a meeting to be held later that day with five City University of New York officials, at which the Bedford-Stuyvesant representatives would present their recommended candidate for president of Community College 7. The Negotiation Team agreed to recommend Rhody McCoy for the position “because of his knowledge of the New York Public School system, his ability to assume leadership, his ability to meet and systematically deal with crisis, and his demonstrated concern for the needs and goals of a Black and Puerto Rican community,” among other qualifications. The team also prepared responses to anticipated arguments against McCoy’s appointment and outlined their own objections to the candidates CUNY officials had proposed. -
January 19, 1969, Letter from Justice Thomas Jones to Al Vann announcing Jones's resignation from the Negotiation Team for Community College 7 On January 19, 1969 New York State Justice Thomas Jones wrote to Al Vann, Chairman of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition for Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS), resigning from his position as a member of the five-member Negotiation Team appointed to represent the Bedford-Stuyvesant community in plans and negotiations with City University of New York (CUNY) officials for Community College 7. Jones’s resignation letter marked the culmination of his correspondence with Vann over the past month, in which he had initially proposed to appoint a proxy to the Negotiation Team, a suggestion Vann rejected on procedural grounds. Although Jones apparently resigned from the Negotiation Team in this letter, he remained directly involved in public discussions about Community College 7, and was a key actor in a conflict that developed in the coming weeks between Bedford-Stuyvesant community leaders over plans for the new college. -
January 10, 1969. Letter from Thomas Jones to Reverend Bishop Richard B. Martin Appointing a Proxy to the Negotiation Team for Community College 7 On January 10, 1969, Justice Thomas Jones wrote to Bishop R.B. Martin, of the Long Island Episcopal Diocese, stating that he would no longer be able to participate in the activities of the five-member Negotiation Team appointed by the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS) to represent their community in planning Community College 7 with City University of New York (CUNY) officials. Explaining that his “responsibilities as justice of the Supreme Court of New York will not permit me to continue the present intensive level of activity” in plans and negotiations, Jones proposed to appoint George Meares, Director of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation, as his proxy on the Negotiation Team. Jones also expressed concerns that CUNY officials involved in the planning process “do not yet comprehend what community control and participation must be to overcome the ravages of educational deprivation suffered by the youth of Bedford-Stuyvesant." In the coming weeks, Jones would publicly split from prominent leaders of the Negotiation Team and their allies over key planning decisions for the new college. -
June 10, 1969 Letter from the Bedford-Stuyvesant "majority dissident" group to CUNY Chancellor Albert Bowker On June 10, 1969, ten representatives of various Bedford-Stuyvesant’s educational and community organizations wrote to Albert Bowker, Chancellor of the City University of New York (CUNY) formally expressing their disagreements with the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services (B-SCENS) Negotiation Team for Community College 7. In recent weeks, the five-member Negotiation Team, which had been appointed by B-SCENS, and chaired by Al Vann, had reached what Bowker had deemed an “impasse” with CUNY officials over the selection of a president for the new college. The letter’s signatories, who included Louise Glover of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and representatives of several local chapters of the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA), demanded to be represented in the ongoing deliberations with CUNY. The “majority dissenters” also cast aspersions on the processes by which Vann and his Negotiation Team had represented the preferences of the broader Bedford-Stuyvesant community. -
February 14, 1968 Statement of the Central Brooklyn Coordinating Committee Regarding the Placement of a Community College in Central Brooklyn On February 14, 1968, the Central Brooklyn Coordinating Council (CBCC), a community-based organization in Bedford-Stuyvesant, issued a public statement in response to City University of New York (CUNY) officials’ announcement two weeks earlier of plans to establish Community College 7 in Central Brooklyn. In the statement, the CBCC outlined a recent history of their efforts to advocate for a tuition-free college in Bedford-Stuyvesant, as well as criticized CUNY’s “lack of empathy for [their] community," demonstrated in a continuing pattern by CUNY of establishing new colleges in neighborhoods inaccessible to Black and Puerto Rican youth. The CBCC expressed support for Community College 7, concluding with demands that the community be involved directly in the planning for the new college. -
February 13, 1968 Youth in Action Press Release Announcing Formation of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Opportunities and Services In this February 13, 1968 press release, Youth in Action (YiA), a Bedford-Stuyvesant-based anti-poverty organization, announced the formation of the “Coalition on Educational Opportunities and Services,” (later changed to “Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition on Educational Needs and Services” or B-SCENS). The new organization, which had been created in response to the mass meeting held several days earlier, was composed of prominent Bedford-Stuyvesant community-based education and anti-poverty organizations. According to press release, the Coalition would continue to meet to seek satisfactory answers from City University of New York (CUNY) officials to questions raised in that earlier meeting about CUNY’s proposed new “Community College 7” in order to allow the community to formulate and propose its own plans for the new college.