Letter from Chancellor Bowker to Members of Community College 7 Planning and Presidential Search Committee
Item
<x.
- ‘ a
J ; ; 4
. The City University of New York
) 535 East Eightieth Street
Now York, New York 10021
July 2, 1968
Office of the Chancellor
Members of Community College VII Planning and Presidential
To:
Search Committee
s of meetings, at the staff level,
Albert H. Bowker
Our purpose in
SEGH a SELLS
From:
During the past few weeks, we have
with the representatives of the Bedford-Stuyvesant community.
having these meetings was to keep up communications and fill time until the com-
These sessions have followed |
munity committee was ready to work on the presidency.
They requested that we provide
the familiar pattern of demands and bargaining.
them with space and services so that they would have a place to meet, would be
able to keep the community informed of their activities, and would be able to have
the necessary resources available so that they could make intelligent and free
decisions on behalf of the community.. A budget of their requests is attached. We
have indicated general agreement except in the matter of consultants.
Ordinarily my office provides such supportive services as may be needed by advisory
committees and search committees. This is the pattern we followed with the Baruch
Advisory Committee, and are now following with the Special Advisory Committee on
Harlem and the SEEK Advisory Committee. Thus, we do not have much experience in
dealing with requests of this nature, but it is our feeling that we should make
an effort to cooperate and try to work toward the reduction of the feeling of mis-
trust that now exists.
The question is a matter of judgment on how to proceed rather than a financial concern.
We do have a substantial sum available for the planning of Community College Number V:
A rational examination of the request leads me to the conclusion that they really
don't need the space and services requested. However, they feel strongly that this
is an important step in equalizing their position in relation to the Board. It is
my feeling that an affirmative move by us at tiis stege of the overall negotiations,
even though questionable as an independent action, would provide long-range benefits.
Up to now we have handled this matter at a staff level to save the Board members
from the trouble of continuous meetings. We do not, however, wish to do anything
the Board might feel is inappropriate. Therefore, if you want us to tell the’ Bedforc-
Stuyvesant Committee that we cannot honor their request, we shall act accordingly.
However, I do think that such action will precipitate a major crisis.
What is your pleasure?
k=] &
7 ge) OSS
iS
Enc: SF @S FP
sje) co
AHB:Slb . : Rar Ay on
<< WwW 2
cc: Mr. Porter R. Chandler a“ Be os s
Mr. Frederick Burkhardt = i
Zw gS
=)
=
Mr. Luis Quero Chiesa
Dr: J. Oscax Lae
- ‘ a
J ; ; 4
. The City University of New York
) 535 East Eightieth Street
Now York, New York 10021
July 2, 1968
Office of the Chancellor
Members of Community College VII Planning and Presidential
To:
Search Committee
s of meetings, at the staff level,
Albert H. Bowker
Our purpose in
SEGH a SELLS
From:
During the past few weeks, we have
with the representatives of the Bedford-Stuyvesant community.
having these meetings was to keep up communications and fill time until the com-
These sessions have followed |
munity committee was ready to work on the presidency.
They requested that we provide
the familiar pattern of demands and bargaining.
them with space and services so that they would have a place to meet, would be
able to keep the community informed of their activities, and would be able to have
the necessary resources available so that they could make intelligent and free
decisions on behalf of the community.. A budget of their requests is attached. We
have indicated general agreement except in the matter of consultants.
Ordinarily my office provides such supportive services as may be needed by advisory
committees and search committees. This is the pattern we followed with the Baruch
Advisory Committee, and are now following with the Special Advisory Committee on
Harlem and the SEEK Advisory Committee. Thus, we do not have much experience in
dealing with requests of this nature, but it is our feeling that we should make
an effort to cooperate and try to work toward the reduction of the feeling of mis-
trust that now exists.
The question is a matter of judgment on how to proceed rather than a financial concern.
We do have a substantial sum available for the planning of Community College Number V:
A rational examination of the request leads me to the conclusion that they really
don't need the space and services requested. However, they feel strongly that this
is an important step in equalizing their position in relation to the Board. It is
my feeling that an affirmative move by us at tiis stege of the overall negotiations,
even though questionable as an independent action, would provide long-range benefits.
Up to now we have handled this matter at a staff level to save the Board members
from the trouble of continuous meetings. We do not, however, wish to do anything
the Board might feel is inappropriate. Therefore, if you want us to tell the’ Bedforc-
Stuyvesant Committee that we cannot honor their request, we shall act accordingly.
However, I do think that such action will precipitate a major crisis.
What is your pleasure?
k=] &
7 ge) OSS
iS
Enc: SF @S FP
sje) co
AHB:Slb . : Rar Ay on
<< WwW 2
cc: Mr. Porter R. Chandler a“ Be os s
Mr. Frederick Burkhardt = i
Zw gS
=)
=
Mr. Luis Quero Chiesa
Dr: J. Oscax Lae
Title
Letter from Chancellor Bowker to Members of Community College 7 Planning and Presidential Search Committee
Description
This letter from Chancellor Bowker to members of Community College 7 Planning and Presidential Search Committee came in response to a series of requests made by the Bedford-Stuyvesant Coalition in prior weeks. Those requests, expressed in a June 18, 1968 telegram from Al Vann, called for the furnishing of funds and space for use by the community's representatives on the Presidential Selection Committee. In this letter, Bowker suggests cooperating with the Coalition in fulfilling their demands in effort to reduce "the feeling of mistrust that now exists" between the community and CUNY. Bowker, however, is hesitant to proceed without the input of others and ultimately announces that he will defer to the consensus opinion of the Board of Higher Education.
Funding for the neighborhood's representatives had been the source of much contention in the preceding weeks, and was an issue that would not be settled for another month. Over the course of Medgar Evers College's creation, CUNY officials and Bedford-Stuyvesant community members often clashed, and this particular dispute is just one example of the several that arose from the community's efforts to exert influence over their college's development.
Funding for the neighborhood's representatives had been the source of much contention in the preceding weeks, and was an issue that would not be settled for another month. Over the course of Medgar Evers College's creation, CUNY officials and Bedford-Stuyvesant community members often clashed, and this particular dispute is just one example of the several that arose from the community's efforts to exert influence over their college's development.
Contributor
Tager, Florence
Creator
Bowker, Albert H.
Date
July 3, 1968
Language
English
Relation
2722
Rights
Copyrighted
Source
CUNY Central Archives
Bowker, Albert H. Letter. “Letter from Chancellor Bowker to Members of Community College 7 Planning and Presidential Search Committee”. 2722, CUNY DIGITAL HISTORY ARCHIVE, accessed March 10, 2026, https://stephenz.tailc22a4b.ts.net/s/cdha/item/356
Time Periods
1961-1969 The Creation of CUNY - Open Admissions Struggle
