All Librarians Date: 25 April 1969

following recommendations at s meeting on April 24, 1969.
It is expected that at « meeting called for Tuesday,

April 29, 1969 the recommendations will be discussed and voted

Your comments ere invited.

a”
7
:

tt
i
;

n - aS Oa ‘ ive = h > et, 1 Poa
Fi is, ae He Ris a: Cee. ieek iin Fe ar eas soe
we Mie ee we ae.

Fina Uy



ace survey questionnaire will be used to gather opinions. For a day or two b
voting sthe campus will be flooded with copies of the questionnaire. On voi
boxes will be placed outside each of the 32 departmental offices. The
Ww manned by the most impartial persons possible to maintain, or, in case
. nepitite sby representatives both of the campus caucus and the ad ad_ hoc committee.
will be on an IBM card to be scored by the computer center on cam campus.
8 xed on the I.D. card ef each student who has voted, and the i; card of each
i > will receive a small notch. All campus groups will be asked to give wari “es
ne éferendm and to urge their members to vote. A possible time for voting

ROUGH DRAFT ON CAMPUS REFERENDUM

The following survey is being conducted by the campus caucus, a & group of representatives —
elected from the various departments, to determine where the majority of students and
. _ faculty stand on the basic issues behind the current dispute.

Ls The appeal process available to faculty members who have not been rehired or iene
tenure should be modified by

. ‘A. the establishment of a first step faculty appeal body elected by full tims faculty.
had Bo the establishment of a first step faculty-student appeal body.

P Co the establishment ef an- impartial non-administrative, non-faculty, non-student

poe GG No change in ‘the present appeal process (appeal to department Personnel and Budge’
7 i Committee, appeal to Committees of six electéd by the college Pers and

ally to the Board of Higher Education).
"a Proceedings leading to retention, tenure, and promotion should be

_ A. open to all members of Q.C. academic community .

Be pes to all members of Q.C. academic comunity if the faculty member involved requests 1
C. revealed only to the faculty member himself on request.
ce secret.

Committee, appeal to President, and fin:

5 In cases of violations of college regulations which of the following legal actions ¢
you believe should be taken? eee ol.
A. No action.
Bo Students” should “ tried before a student judicial body with appropriate ay eal
_-~precess availab ee
€. Students should er tried before a faculty judicial body with approprir.e ay ” al
ss process: available. AL eee
_ De Students should be tried before a student-faculty-administr

=

'
= ae) ee s
meter es to the academic | process of thiz sida in pape ;

rd made up of ptr prada and snr wi
lems aro the Bhool Be meng
sponsible fe :



e. y

should be cated on oan

there is ‘Suton ret life.
here is threat to life or extreme property tuna actually occurring.
; there isa violation of the civil law. —

pent Personnel and Budget Comnittees as voting menbers with majority

| voting power. Pf
department Personnel and Budget Committees as irs without voting status.

department Tprrooael and Budget fompos ne to ue on

proc ae oa of ee Personnel and Budget Committees.

faculty member arrested for ae in the recent

rere, civil or administres: x
e due |

subj ees cademi process; civil pring “should be dropped.
t to academic due Process with suspended sentence; civil charges:

% to no admini stiits ro charges; civil charges should remain.
chin istrative alae

s and faculty who choose ha aeaa should be Ss ota’ Be
submit their grievances toa student-faculty~ sdministration

strate freely as ‘long as they do not violate civil law.
trate freely as long as they do not. ane the academic and
the college.

j ae necessary except one that endanger

glife or causes

ste rieesky ag long as they do not violate campus regulations.

ron

_”
»E

= NE
hg it s
A “i ar ,

a . ‘
“0 8 aay 7 i ‘ a he

- ny